Jodo
Shinshu: Freedom and Responsibility
The following article was written by the late Rev.
Philip Karl Eidmann who was a Jodoshinshu minister for many
years in California. He was one of my mentors while I spent
ten summers as a student at the Institute of Buddhist
Studies in the early ‘70’s. I also spent two summers as a
guest student. That meant I could attend the lectures and
events I wanted with free time to study on my own. Each
summer I had the privilege of spending time with Rev.
Eidmann and his close friend, Rev. Kusada.
The following article is designed to help the students at
IBS learn about the Hongwanji’s historical attitudes on a
problem many institutions face, namely the conflict between
maintaining a consistency in both the content and the
presentation of a teaching throughout history. On one hand,
the necessity of personal freedom and on the other,
responsibility. In fact, both personal freedom and
responsibility make for fertile ground out of which
creativity in turn can guarantee further participation in
the thread of history. There is often a great tension
between these two: the consistency of dogma and individual
freedom. In many traditions they are mutually antagonistic
forces.
Rev. Eidmann’s explanations of how the Hongwanji solved
this conflict to allow for both creativity and consistency
within its organizational structure serves well as the
basis for pride in the uniqueness of this tradition. This
is a difficult task presently when trust in organized
religions has fallen on hard times.
The article was written in 1957. It was given to me as
a gift by the author. I believe it is time to share it with
the general public, especially since Buddhism has grown in
popularity in the Western world. The fact that the West is
struggling to put its own face on Buddhism makes the
information in this article very timely indeed.
The
Hongwanji as a Guardian of the Spirit of Freedom
Few religions are the equal of Buddhism in their insistence
upon individual responsibility for the actions in one’s
life. This idea of individual responsibility is the very
heart of what later came to be called democracy.
Responsibility for one’s own actions is the cornerstone
upon which Buddhism is built.
Buddhists through out the world strive to express their
sense of responsibility in their every-day lives.
Unfortunately, both in the past and the present, there are
countries which live little room for individual thought and
action. Even under such adverse conditions, however,
Buddhists try to keep alive the flickering flame of
freedom. The heritage of freedom has been handed down
through the long centuries of tribulation by Buddhists, as
individuals and as organized schools.
No country, anywhere in the world, has been spared its
trials, and Japan, in its two thousand years of history,
has many times seen its light burn low. One of the few
places, however, where even in the most difficult days
where democratic ideals were preserved in Japan was within
the Hongwanji sect of Buddhism. The Hongwanji today, an
international body with followers throughout the world, is
founded upon the teachings of Shinran.
This Japanese saint, who lived in twelfth century of the
Common Era, had tried to find peace of mind in the monastic
life. Shinran found himself unsuccessful in his spiritual
discipline and withdrew from the monastery. In Buddhism,
however, the vows of a monk are not perpetual, and
Shinran’s actions did not mean he was abandoning Buddhism.
After returning to lay life, Shinran even increased his
piety, and he attained peace of mind. Thereafter, Shinran
spent his time teaching the great truths of Buddhism to all
who were interested.
Shinran was a cultivated gentleman, a great scholar. He
was, in fact, a distant relative of the Emperor. However,
he came to the common people as a common man. He took as a
model the scriptural sentence, “Equal in….the thought of
the Buddha because there is neither separation nor
discrimination. All in the four seas are brothers.” Shinran
always denied that he had any disciples; he only had
friends and fellow-travelers on the path.
These friends of Shinran organized themselves into little
groups called montos. In these tiny congregations all were
equal, and all shared in the responsibility of maintaining
the teachings of the Buddha. The followers of Shinran met
regularly with the monto to which they belonged. Such
meetings were held in meeting houses (dojo) which were
often only the house of one of the members.
The congregationalism started thus remains today one of the
distinctive features of Shin Buddhism. Indeed throughout
much of its history, Shin was called The Sect of the monto
congregations. To this day the affairs of the Shin
congregations are conducted with the consent and
consultation of the individual members. However it is not
merely in its organization that Hongwanji seeks to preserve
its heritage of democratic freedom.
In Japan, since the early days, there was a class of
outcast called Eta. Near the end of the last century the
Japanese Emperor decreed these outcasts free of their
age-long restrictions. However, social discrimination dies
slowly and the descendents of the Eta are still looked down
upon. Nevertheless, within the Hongwanji these people have
always been regarded as equal. For generations the majority
of the Eta were followers of the Shin Sect, though of
course only a small percentage of all the members of the
monto-congregations were Eta. As Shin followers these
people were not regarded as inferior by their fellow
believers. They were admitted freely into the monto as
equals. Indeed, only recently the Hongwanji took emphatic
action to preserve this equality.
A clergyman of another school of Shin Buddhism was invited
to lecture in a Hongwanji lecture-hall. During the course
of his lecture, this clergyman said that the Eta really
were inferior to other people. The Hongwanji immediately
asked the speaker to apologize, and it made a formal
protest to the See of this clergyman’s branch of the Shin
sect. In its handling of this unfortunate incident, the
Hongwanji reaffirmed that all men are by nature equal.
It is according to Buddha’s teaching deeds and deeds alone
that make a man noble or an outcast; and none of us is so
wise that he may safely judge another.
This high ideal is clearly set forth in two unique
documents preserved I the Hongwanji scriptures.
One of these is the Seventeenth Article
Constitution of Prince Shutoku. The other is a compact in
seven articles signed by Honen and his disciples. Both
these documents occupy an important position in the
Buddhist heritage of freedom.
Prince Shotoku’s Constitution is, in fact, one of the great
democratic documents in world history. Shotoku was
Prince Regent of Japan at the beginning of the seventh
century of the Common Era. Shotoku’s Constitution was
administrative directive which laid down the principles
upon which he hoped to build his nation’s future.
“Banish wrath and give up angry countenances,” begins the
tenth article. “Be not resentful when others dissent form
us, for everyone has his own mind and each mind has its own
tendencies. I may regard as wrong what another holds to be
right; he may regard as wrong what I hold to be right. I am
not assuredly a sage, nor he assuredly a fool. Both of us
are simply ordinary men.”
The fifth article of Shotoku’s article declares even the
poorest person is to have equality before the law. The
seventh requires honest and intelligent officials, and
notes: “When wise men are entrusted with offices, the voice
of praise arises. When corrupt men hold offices, disasters
are multiplied. There are in the world few endowed with
inborn wisdom. Through earnest aspiration one may become a
sage.”
The eleventh article requires that merit be rewarded, crime
be given punishment suited to it. The twelfth article
criticizes arbitrary and excessive taxation which will
impoverish the nation. The eighth article requires
officials to present themselves for work early and only go
home late after all affairs have been handled.
The fifteenth article officials put the public interest
before their own in carrying out their duties. “When one is
moved by private motives, he is necessarily resentful. When
he cherishes a grudging feeling, he fails to cooperate with
others. When cooperation fails, the private obstructs
the public.
“Decisions on matters”, declares the seventh article,
“should not be done by one alone, but they should be
discussed with many. As minor matters are of less
consequence, there is less necessity of consultation. In
the case of important matters, the fear is that there may
be errors, so they should examined together by the many.
Then the deliberation will arrive at the truth. “
Shinran saw this document as an important heritage for
Buddhists everywhere, and he transmitted it to his
followers so that its ideals would be preserved for future
generations. Another of the important writings which
Shinran entrusted to his followers is a declaration in
seven articles written by Honen.
Honen was the friend and teacher of Shinran, and it was at
this sage’s feet that Shinran art last found spiritual
peace of mind. Honen on one occasion drew up a formal
compact giving seven rules for disciples to follow. Nearly
two hundred disciples, Shinran among them, pledged
themselves to practice these rules of their spiritual
master.
The first article forbade Honen’s disciples, in their
devotion, to adversely criticize the principles of other
sects and schools.
The second says that the ignorant must not get into angry
disputes with those who differ from them in the theory and
practice of religion.
The third reads, “You must not foolishly nor
narrow-mindedly insist that people of a different faith and
practice from your own give up their distinctive religious
practices. Never jest them. “
The fourth requires Honen’s disciples never to encourage
anyone to break the precepts laid down by Shakyamuni
Buddha.
The fifth, in part, declares, “ You must not lead the
ignorant astray by getting into quarrelsome disputes with
them, which can only bring upon you the derision of the
learned. “
The sixth cautions against teaching doctrines through
ignorance of the scriptures and thereby influencing the
ignorant for the worse.
The final article reads, “You must not set forth your own
opinions contrary to the teaching of the Buddhas, wrongly
calling them the views of your teachers.”
Here is part of the heritage of freedom which Shinran has
transmitted to modern times. The Hongwanji has
guarded it devotedly through the centuries to protect it
from decay and destruction.
There have been many tomes in history, however, when those
who seek to be the guardians of freedom have been the most
intolerant and bigoted. There is always danger that, in
Freedom’s name, freedom and personal responsibility will be
crushed to earth. It is, therefore interesting to observe
the way the Hongwanji guards itself from error.
Naturally, as a church body, the Hongwanji must have some
means of bringing to account those who misuse its name to
teach false doctrines. There is a system of ecclesiastical
courts whose extreme punishment is excommunication.
However, the Hongwanji‘s respect for individual
responsibility is so great that hardly once in a generation
is there an excommunication.
Cause for excommunication is to teach in the name of the
Hongwanji any doctrine which all Hongwanji followers have
not traditionally accepted.
However, any Hongwanji clergyman is perfectly free to
preach whatever he wishes. He may freely teach in his
temple the teachings of any sect; he may, if he desires,
even Christianity or Islam. The Hongwanji would take no
action, and even his congregation would not complain unless
his talks were boring. The teachings which the minister
includes in his sermons are his own personal
responsibility.
However, if he even once said that the unorthodox subject
matter in his sermons is Hongwanji doctrine, then he would
be called to account. Daily for his whole life a clergyman
could preach that black was white, and there would be no
question of his right to speak. But even if once he says
that the Hongwanji says that black is white, he would be
asked to explain his actions.
Called before the ecclesiastical courts, the erring
clergyman be asked to present his proof that that this is
correct Hongwanji doctrine. If after several years of
discussions, he can not convince the court, he would be
asked to admit that this is a personal view. If he accepts
this position, he will agree that the statements are made
on his individuality. This will end the matter.
It will be seen from this that the basis for
excommunication for the Hongwanji is quite different from
most religions. The question is not really of truth of
falsity of doctrine.
The Hongwanji has supreme confidence that truth will
conquer error, and it will introduce no inquisition to aid
the battle. Where truth is, error is not; and no goading
from witch-hunters can drive out error if it does not
disappear naturally before truth.
Thus the sole cause for excommunication is the Hongwanji is
refusal to accept personal responsibility for personal
views. The entire matter for heresy in the Hongwanji
resolves into a question of responsibility. This in turn
brings back a statement of Honen, “You must not foolishly
nor narrow-mindedly insist upon people of a
different faith and practice from you own giving up their
distinctive religious practices… You must not set forth
your own opinions contrary to the teachings of the Buddhas,
wrongly calling them the views of your teachers.”
If, however, someone insists upon placing the
responsibility for some wrong doctrine on the Hongwanji, he
will be excommunicated. But even after excommunication he
may still be invited to speak in Shin congregations.
Excommunication means merely that the Hongwanji accepts no
responsibility for the orthodoxy of the man’s teachings. It
does not deny him the right to continue to speak on his own
responsibility. When an excommunicated preacher lectures in
a Shin temple, the people know that they must carefully
weigh the value of his every word; but they do not fear
him, nor reject him unheard.
Beyond this, no institution can ever really protect its
followers from error. No censorship can prevent error from
being spread. The only real solution, the solution the
Hongwanji advocates, is to encourage people to fully accept
the full responsibility for their actions and thoughts.
This solution will not make for unity on small matters, but
there will be a greater unity on important points. There
will be a unity in the acceptance of the ideals of freedom,
responsibility and the attainment of truth.
Such unity does not make for political or temporal power.
The very ideal of responsibility will make a difference of
opinion on how these ideals may be realized in everyday
life. It is upon the honest respect for such differences of
opinion that democracy is based. “Be not resentful when
others dissent from us”, charged Prince Shotoku, “for
everyone has his own mind and each mind has its own
tendencies. I may regard as wrong what another holds to be
right: he may regard as wrong what I hold to be right. I am
not assuredly a sage, nor he assuredly a fool. Both of us
are simply ordinary men.”
This is the spirit of freedom which the Hongwanji has
guarded through its long history. It is the basis of
freedom, not just in ordinary life, but in a higher,
spiritual sense as well. Spiritual freedom -salvation - is
simply the absolute perfection of ordinary, everyday
freedom. The Hongwanji’s task in the world is to aid its
followers to attain this perfect freedom. The fact that
many such followers do attain this perfect spiritual
freedom may be taken as proof of the success of the
Hongwanji in the fulfilling its obligations as a guardian
of the spirit of freedom.
Article found in the “Lion’s Roar”, Oct. 1957
By Rev. P. K. Eidmann
In gratitude, copied and preserved with the author’s
permission
by Rev. Ulrich, Manitoba Buddhist Temple
September 1, 2009
Rev. Philip Karl Eidmann
January 3, 1924 to May 12, 1997
Prince Shotoko-572-621
Shinran-1173-1262
Honen-1133-1212